P2SH

Revision as of 23:27, 12 January 2020 by Brendan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "=DISCLAIMER= This page is a direct copy of https://en.bitcoin.it/w/Pay_to_script_hash and may require extensive editing {{infobox miner activated fork|title=Pay to Script Has...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

DISCLAIMER

This page is a direct copy of https://en.bitcoin.it/w/Pay_to_script_hash and may require extensive editing

Template:Infobox miner activated forkPay to script hash (P2SH) transactions were standardised in BIP 16. They allow transactions to be sent to a script hash (address starting with 3) instead of a public key hash (addresses starting with 1). To spend bitcoins sent via P2SH, the recipient must provide a script matching the script hash and data which makes the script evaluate to true.

Using P2SH, you can send bitcoins to an address that is secured in various unusual ways without knowing anything about the details of how the security is set up. You just send bitcoins to the ~34-character P2SH address. The recipient might need the signatures of several people to spend these bitcoins, or a password might be required, or the requirements could be completely unique.

Addresses

BIP 13 specifies the address format. Bitcoin P2SH addresses always start with 3.

Example

Transaction 40eee3ae1760e3a8532263678cdf64569e6ad06abc133af64f735e52562bccc8 paid to P2SH address 3P14159f73E4gFr7JterCCQh9QjiTjiZrG. You can see the redeem script in transaction 7edb32d4ffd7a385b763c7a8e56b6358bcd729e747290624e18acdbe6209fc45 which spends that output, using OP_FALSE <sig> { OP_1 <pubkey> OP_1 OP_CHECKMULTISIG }.

History

The first activation window failed and another was set to be active on 1 April 2012, in v0.6.0rc2<ref>Move BIP16 switchover time to April 1 (gavinandresen)</ref>. Users running v0.6.0rc1 who did not upgrade for the delay, activated early and got stuck on block 170,060<ref>bitcointalk topic 63165</ref> when an invalid transaction according to their nodes was mined. Later soft fork activation techniques, such as BIP 34 and BIP 9, reflect on block history to determine activation (also from miner signaling) in order to prevent this problem.

After activation problems were then caused by the remaining 45% of miners producing invalid blocks for several months<ref>A Complete History of Bitcoin’s Consensus Forks</ref>. Later soft fork activation techniques raised the signaling enforcement threshold from 55% to 95% in order to mitigate this problem.

Testnet activated following its first window, which was two weeks earlier than the first (failed) mainnet window<ref>Remove -bip16 and -paytoscripthashtime command-line arguments (gavinandresen)</ref>.

342ftSRCvFHfCeFFBuz4xwbeqnDw6BGUey is a Bitcoin address notable for being the first P2SH-compatible address receiving bitcoins on the production network. Its payment was mined in block 160720; note that it was spent prior to the enforcement of BIP 16, so it's not a good example to understand P2SH.

References